lil_bobby_260
Post #6
Wheels are ugly. Also guaging a cars power by bragging about what it beats on the street makes you look like a bit of a tool. Yeah my apexigreddyomguleh N13 beats boosted rb's and rotors all day What cam are you running ? Well how else would you have one give an example of the power a car puts down without a dyno chart? "it's fast". And I'm not a huge fan of the wheels either but yet were free and had great tyres. They look ok I guess but are bloody heavy. |
---|
skylineman
Post #7
wow...... can take mild turbo skylines. best thing to say is. " stock " mate if u dont know the power. prepare for flames and call outs. |
---|
lil_bobby_260
Post #10
Haha the car is what it is, and does what it does. If my description of it upsets people and hurts their feelings or whatever, I'm not going to be bothered by it... |
---|
*Tricky*
Post #13
Easily takes down 5L V8s, and standard/mild turbo skylines. 4.0L with the right setup is no slouch. Amusing...because I promise you that you trying to take on v8's with it, they would be just shaking there head and laughing lol. If they actually tried even in the slightest...you'd be eating their dust. |
---|
AllTrack
Post #16
If he has what he says he has I beleive him beating stock 5l 8s and stock/mild turboed cars. I don't know why more people don't buy and mod these things 180rwkw can be attained N/A with very aggressive cams, shaved head, P&P, exhaust manifold etc. Don't expect it to be that streetable thats for sure. Mine idled like a MotherF***er though but everything else was awesome. Was heaps of fun in the Auto and mine was also a ute so I never had traction (my experience) |
---|
lil_bobby_260
Post #18
Yeah was pretty sad in the 90s. The 4l fords were faster than the 5l Windsor v8s. And with a few light mods were pretty decent motors. |
---|
wheelzie1989
Post #20
mmm doubt you would be beating turbo'd skylines in this.... |
---|
stockmy00
Post #21
Well how else would you have one give an example of the power a car puts down without a dyno chart? "it's fast". And I'm not a huge fan of the wheels either but yet were free and had great tyres. They look ok I guess but are bloody heavy. IF your NA straight 6 can chop 5l v8s ... they aren't trying bud. Though having said that, the 4L straight 6 does make good power. Very nice car mate, I would give up the dream of being a drag strip king though unless you plan to drop an aspirated 6 or 8 in there. |
---|
TurboXR
Post #22
Yeah was pretty sad in the 90s. The 4l fords were faster than the 5l Windsor v8s. And with a few light mods were pretty decent motors. Ive had some fast cars - 5l v8s and single/twin turbo rb powered nissans, and toyotas. I can post them in this forum too if you like. I am simply comparing it to other cars I've driven. I'm Not 17 like some of you lot seem to be :-) And tricky, v8s aren't the all that younseemnto think they are. They are a good base, but still need decent cash spent on them to get them really moving. The man speaks the truth, Stock EF-EL Tickford XR6 was faster/handled better than EL XR8 and would easily out run a VN to maybe 1997 SS Commo. Just like the BA-FG Xr6 Turbos Vs. (Model Equivelent) Stock XR8/SS are faster and handles better as lower weight over the front. |
---|
If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.
Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.
If you don't have an account create one below.
Create AccountLogin using your Facebook account!