Login
Upload Entry
 |
011ENS
Post #37
QUOTE(GTR120WHY @ Jul 22 2008, 02:44 PM) [snapback]1282638701[/snapback]  i was hoping the Weld wheels would take away the cuteness  ^ nothing will ever take that away! You've made a bit of improvement from the stock 69bhp @ 7000rpm  This makes me feel bad about all of the 120Y's that i've used as bush bashers 
 22nd July 2008 - 05:05 PM
Reply
|
|---|
 |
DET20
Post #47
QUOTE(Joshh @ Jul 22 2008, 05:21 PM) [snapback]1282639323[/snapback] wow that's insane. Glad to see ur keeping it on the street. Can't wait to see this on the track! Just a pitty that you cant have an awesome car like this and be legal on the street too  Looking good tho Steve! 22nd July 2008 - 06:24 PM
Reply
|
|---|
 |
iamhappy46
Post #50
Normally, when I see a Datsun 120Y, I do ask 120WHY but this time I ask... why not! QUOTE(GTR120WHY @ Jul 22 2008, 02:52 PM) [snapback]1282638713[/snapback] I'm only allowed a maximum of 2.3L for street use  I looked at buying your wheels a while back. I have Commodore pattern with ford brakes, but no way could i fit your rear wheels under my gaurds without major surgery. Car weighs in at 920Kg right? 2300cc x 1.2(forced induction penalty) and then divide the capacity by 3 to get the minimum kilograms the car must weigh or have they changed the rules? 22nd July 2008 - 06:47 PM
Reply
|
|---|
 |
insertcoolname
Post #51
Must have been fun modifying that head for use on a 78mm bore from 86/87. 22nd July 2008 - 07:01 PM
Reply
|
|---|
 |
GTR120WHY
Post #55
QUOTE(dj fraser @ Jul 22 2008, 05:15 PM) [snapback]1282639291[/snapback] nice paint job wow those vision apprentices did a good job prepping it!!!Its all in the prep work Thanks QUOTE(iamhappy46 @ Jul 22 2008, 06:47 PM) [snapback]1282639817[/snapback] Normally, when I see a Datsun 120Y, I do ask 120WHY but this time I ask... why not! Car weighs in at 920Kg right? 2300cc x 1.2(forced induction penalty) and then divide the capacity by 3 to get the minimum kilograms the car must weigh or have they changed the rules? Original weight is 835kg and multiply by 2.75 for forced induction which equals 2296cc. 22nd July 2008 - 07:54 PM
Reply
|
|---|
|
|
GTR120WHY
Post #58
QUOTE(insertcoolname @ Jul 22 2008, 07:01 PM) [snapback]1282639897[/snapback] Must have been fun modifying that head for use on a 78mm bore from 86/87. Nice work on the stroker, 25 crank? Last time I checked 26 crank with pistons/rods gives you 2.4 Either way love it. Engines aren't my thing, but by memory the bores are a touch over 83mm and the head had alot of work done on it. It was at the builder for over 6 months. Don't know if it will work until i turn the key Some updated pics below of the diff sitting in to work out the position on the springs. QUOTE(DET20 @ Jul 22 2008, 08:00 PM) [snapback]1282640350[/snapback] How did you manage to work with the difference in bore size? With a bit of tig here and a bit of tig there 22nd July 2008 - 08:23 PM
Reply
|
|---|
|
|
iamhappy46
Post #69
QUOTE(insertcoolname @ Jul 22 2008, 07:01 PM) [snapback]1282639897[/snapback] Must have been fun modifying that head for use on a 78mm bore from 86/87. Nice work on the stroker, 25 crank? Last time I checked 26 crank with pistons/rods gives you 2.4 Either way love it. Stock crank with wider bore pistons would for for an RB22, not everybody needs a stroker. However, I would be worried with the valves hitting the bores cause there is going to be bugger all real estate between the valve and the deck... 22nd July 2008 - 09:41 PM
Reply
|
|---|
-
Member Login
If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.
Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.
If you don't have an account create one below.
Create Account -
Login using your Facebook account!
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Loading...
x