Wat Kw Or Hp Is A Vr Holden?  

Page 1 of 2
Jump to page
audi_a4_turbo
  • audi_a4_turbo
  • Standard User
  • Member No.: 3,101
  • Joined: 8-July 03
  • Posts: 162
  • From: Australia
Post #1 post 3rd December 2003 - 10:28 PM
.................................?
Enema
Post #2

Google is your friend...

Maximum Power: 130 kW @ 4800 RPM (V6)
Maximum Torque: 295 Nm @ 3200 RPM

Maximum Power: 165kW @ 4400 RPM (V8)
Maximum Torque: 385Nm @ 3600 RPM

Maximum Power: 185kW @ 4800 rpm (HSV Enhanced V8)
Maximum Torque: 400 Nm @ 3600 rpm

s13viper
Post #3

yep, dems are it, lol

i noticed they arnt the reviest of engines. lol

QUOTE (audi_a4_turbo @ Dec 3 2003, 10:28 PM)
.................................?

did one beat you?

QUOTE (Kei @ Dec 3 2003, 10:40 PM)
Google is your friend...

Maximum Power: 130 kW @ 4800 RPM (V6)
Maximum Torque: 295 Nm @ 3200 RPM

Maximum Power: 165kW @ 4400 RPM (V8)
Maximum Torque: 385Nm @ 3600 RPM

Maximum Power: 185kW @ 4800 rpm (HSV Enhanced V8)
Maximum Torque: 400 Nm @ 3600 rpm

Please don't take this as a slur on you Suzmot, but that site has to be wrong on the V6 power output specs.

130kw just can't be right. From my records in books I have on Holdens it's actually 147kw @ 4800 RPM. 130kw sounds way to low for that 3.8ltr V6. Hell my 2001 3.2ltr DOHC V6 Rodeo is 140kw, and the Holden Fronter which uses the same engine is 150kw, so there is no way 130kw can be right. If I'm wrong shoot me down in flaming Moe's.

_J_e_n_
Post #6

according to drive.com.au in the 'value your car section' a 3.8L v6 vr 1994 ed has 130kw @ the engine.

unlike some, the mighty Kei actually posts facts after doing some kind of research to validate what he says.

QUOTE (_J_e_n_ @ Dec 4 2003, 10:23 AM)
according to drive.com.au in the 'value your car section' a 3.8L v6 vr 1994 ed has 130kw @ the engine.

unlike some, the mighty Kei actually posts facts after doing some kind of research to validate what he says.

My most humble apologies Jen and Kei. The book that I had taken the details from "Heart of the Lion, written by John Wright has the figure around the wrong way with a special note in the rear of the book.

You are indeed right KEI, 130kw for the 3.8lt 231ci VR engine, and 147kw for the VS to VT ECOTEC 3.8lt 231ci engine. That is wear the miss print occured in those two power output figures. May certain boost members have forgiveness on me

Daz_V6si
Post #8

THere was also a 5.7litre stroker available from HSV in the GTS (and I belive the Senator as well) Which has 215kw And I cant quite remember the torque figure off the top of my head...

Daz

Mighty-3
Post #9

what's the VY series 2 (ecotech 6cyl) got?

QUOTE (BrisBlitz @ Dec 4 2003, 10:40 AM)
what's the VY series 2 (ecotech 6cyl) got?

152KW I believe from the V6.

Daz

QUOTE (BrisBlitz @ Dec 4 2003, 10:40 AM)
what's the VY series 2 (ecotech 6cyl) got?

VX-VY 3.8ltr 231ci ECOTEC V6 is 152kw.

Rule of thumb to workout flywheel kw to rear wheel kw is minus 30% from the flywheel kw figure to give you a rear wheel figure

From memory 1kw = 1.34hp, but don't quote me on that as there appears to be some people who just like to stick the knife in if I get it wrong

_J_e_n_
Post #12

haha and some people just have a cry if others correct them when they post up incorrect facts..

I think your question has been answered audi_a4

essentially 4 engines in the vr series:

v6 3.8L - 130kw

v8 5.0L - 165kw

v8 5.0L HSV enhanced (yay yay! my engine!) 185kw

v8 (purportedly 5.7L but i thought these only came out in VS..) - 215kw ?? not sure on this one. www.drive.com.au might be worth a look - go to 'value your car' on the left menu and go from there. the figures on there are usually fairly spot-on.

the v6's didn't start getting half-decent power until later models.

please also note that all kw figures are @ the engine, not the wheels.

QUOTE (_J_e_n_ @ Dec 4 2003, 11:12 AM)
haha and some people just have a cry if others correct them when they post up incorrect facts..

I think your question has been answered audi_a4

essentially 4 engines in the vr series:

v6 3.8L - 130kw

v8 5.0L - 165kw

v8 5.0L HSV enhanced (yay yay! my engine!) 185kw

v8 (purportedly 5.7L but i thought these only came out in VS..) - 215kw ?? not sure on this one. www.drive.com.au might be worth a look - go to 'value your car' on the left menu and go from there. the figures on there are usually fairly spot-on.

the v6's didn't start getting half-decent power until later models.

please also note that all kw figures are @ the engine, not the wheels.

To elaborate further, their was actually two versions of the 5.7litre. (which were effectively a stroked version of the 5litre)(They were done by "Holden Engine Company"). They were only ever available in the GTS's and Senator's.

The first was as _J_e_n_ stated 215kw. But back then you had the option of getting the 5.7litre engines blueprinted by Holden Racing Team. This option cost $10,000 and booted the power up to 220kw's (they claimed). When the option first appeared they tested a standard 5.7l vs a 5.7l (blueprinted) and the standard one was quicker, which pretty much killed the blueprint option (although a handful were still blueprinted).

magna6
Post #14

using the 30% power loss through to the rear wheels, a VR would have only 91kW@wheels! and a VS only 103kW@wheels.
me likes one thing about FWD, less power loss through drivetrain biggrin.gif

big929
Post #15

umm, my 3.0L V6 DOHC makes 138Kw (on drive). So even though the VR engine is a 3.8L, my 3.0L is still more powerful? Is this due to having DOHC's?

QUOTE (big929 @ Dec 4 2003, 12:03 PM)
umm, my 3.0L V6 DOHC makes 138Kw (on drive). So even though the VR engine is a 3.8L, my 3.0L is still more powerful? Is this due to having DOHC's?

I'm guessing so, as I have the same thing. I have a 3.2ltr V6 DOHC Rodeo and it's 140kw, the frontera has the same engine and is 150kw. I do know that the DOHC make them heaps "tourquer" off the line. Who would have thought our engines would make better power then the 3.8ltr V6?

big929
Post #17

yeah i know, i was like, WTF? COOL! but a VR would kill me due to the fact that my car weighs nearly 1.7tonne!!!!! damn you luxury car!! plus the weight of chrome wheels, big stereo and me!

QUOTE (DaBigMan2 @ Dec 4 2003, 10:40 AM)
THere was also a 5.7litre stroker available from HSV in the GTS (and I belive the Senator as well) Which has 215kw And I cant quite remember the torque figure off the top of my head...

Daz

i thought the senator was simply an upgraded 5.0 redtop (injected)

QUOTE (king of the concrete jungle @ Dec 4 2003, 10:19 AM)
QUOTE (Kei @ Dec 3 2003, 10:40 PM)
Google is your friend...

Maximum Power: 130 kW @ 4800 RPM  (V6)
Maximum Torque: 295 Nm @ 3200 RPM

Maximum Power: 165kW @ 4400 RPM  (V8)
Maximum Torque: 385Nm @ 3600 RPM

Maximum Power: 185kW @ 4800 rpm  (HSV Enhanced V8)
Maximum Torque: 400 Nm @ 3600 rpm

Please don't take this as a slur on you Suzmot, but that site has to be wrong on the V6 power output specs.

130kw just can't be right. From my records in books I have on Holdens it's actually 147kw @ 4800 RPM. 130kw sounds way to low for that 3.8ltr V6. Hell my 2001 3.2ltr DOHC V6 Rodeo is 140kw, and the Holden Fronter which uses the same engine is 150kw, so there is no way 130kw can be right. If I'm wrong shoot me down in flaming Moe's.

thats because the izusu engine in your rodeo is good, and the VR V6 is shit.

its 130

mAJORD
Post #20


















***************************************

magna6
Post #21

well big929, my 3.0L V6 is only SOHC but it makes 140kW. How? well for a start it has 24 valves smile.gif

i agree with Majord, those old school holden V6's are just crap

clifford
Post #22

127kw vn
cant remember vp?
130kw vr
145kw vs
147kw vt
152kw vx
152kw vy

Enema
Post #23

Remember people.. peak power doesn't mean anything...

To work out how good an engine is you need to know the area under the curve of both HP and TQ.

Don't get me wrong, the Holden V6's are horrible no matter which way you look at it... but I like to stop the whole "peak power" argument before it gets started. smile.gif

King - no harm no foul wink.gif

Phonic
Post #24

The 3.8s in the holdens arn't really revy, because they have 2 valves per cylinder and are pushrod so they don't breath as much and have more moving parts compared to a over head camed 24 vlave V6.

And i'm sure there was a 5.7l (twin throtle body) in the VN Group A SS ? huh.gif they had somthing around 200kW????

king of the concrete jungle
Post #25

The HSV VN SS GRP A 215kw, was a straight engine, unstroked, however had a four-bolts mains block. It was the computer programing and Twin throttle manifold that produced the goods. The VN SS GRP A twin throttle manifold produced 15kw more power then the Walkinshaw (HSV VL SS GRP A) one. The Walkinshaw had a peak power output of 180kw, and it to was unstroked. Holden first used the "stroker" engine in the VR GTS, after they revived the GTS name for the previous VP series. The twin throttle wasn't used on the VP GTS as Holden and HSV didn't want a bonnet buldge, which was neccessary to run the TTB. It did however pick up the four-bolt mains block, and it was 200kw

QUOTE (king of the concrete jungle @ Dec 4 2003, 12:10 PM)
I'm guessing so, as I have the same thing. I have a 3.2ltr V6 DOHC Rodeo and it's 140kw, the frontera has the same engine and is 150kw. I do know that the DOHC make them heaps "tourquer" off the line. Who would have thought our engines would make better power then the 3.8ltr V6?

they Are Japanese Engines

Phonic
Post #27

King of the Concreate Jungle wrote:

QUOTE

The HSV VN SS GRP A 215kw, was a straight engine, unstroked, however had a four-bolts mains block. It was the computer programing and Twin throttle manifold that produced the goods. The VN SS GRP A twin throttle manifold produced 15kw more power then the Walkinshaw (HSV VL SS GRP A) one. The Walkinshaw had a peak power output of 180kw, and it to was unstroked. Holden first used the "stroker" engine in the VR GTS, after they revived the GTS name for the previous VP series. The twin throttle wasn't used on the VP GTS as Holden and HSV didn't want a bonnet buldge, which was neccessary to run the TTB. It did however pick up the four-bolt mains block, and it was 200kw


Yeah I did a bit of looking around and found an older Motor Mag and it had a section about the Holden V8. And it stated that if the 215 strokers in the VS had the Twin Trole Body setup of the VN Group A they would have been closer to 280 - 300kW becuase the stock manifold is apparentlly restrictive.

QUOTE (Phonic @ Dec 5 2003, 02:37 PM)
Yeah I did a bit of looking around and found an older Motor Mag and it had a section about the Holden V8. And it stated that if the 215 strokers in the VS had the Twin Trole Body setup of the VN Group A they would have been closer to 280 - 300kW becuase the stock manifold is apparentlly restrictive.

The biggest problen with the Holden EFI V8 was it's restrictive breathing system. It pulled like steam train down low and mid range and has a real "animalistic" feel to it, but up high it suffered. Alot of people have this misconception when they work on this engine that they have to stroke it to make it go harder, when in actual fact all that needs is some good head work and proper induction set up. STARR Performance in Melbourne finally woke up to this fact and now make a 90mm throttle body manifold for straight over replacement for about $2000-$2500. It looks identical to the factory "banans" but gives great gains in power, and most importantly torque.

The Twin Throttle Body (TTB) set up off the VL HSV SS GRP A or better known as the Walkinshaw, was the first of the TTB's fitted to a factory Holden. It was a great system. Then in the VN HSV SS GRP A a newly developed one was fitted. As I stated earlier it flowed 15kw better then the Walkinshaw TTB. A Walkinshaw or VN SS GRP A TTB these days sells for around $4000-$5000. C.O.M.E. Harrop and Motec all make TTB's systems these days, C.O.M.E. being the cheapest at $2000, to the most expensive being Motec at $8000

The single reason that HSV and Holden didn't run the TTB in the VP GTS and cars after the VN was that they didn't want to have bonnet buldges, which is an unfortunite side effect of having the TTB. You can these days fit a TTB without the bonnet bulge, by having the bonnet bracing cut away and it's a very tight fit trust me, or drop the engine 10mm. These days it's not uncommon for a 215kw Holden EFI V8 to be fitted with a TTB and a few internal mods to give it a genuine 330-350kw @ the flywheel and hell do they get up and move in this form too!

QUOTE (cliffe @ Dec 4 2003, 08:04 AM)
did one beat you?

fuck no, some dickhead i know reackons there 160

_J_e_n_
Post #30

hahhaha all that crap for a question that got answered on the first page, classic laugh.gif

well i'm glad you found out your answer audi_a4_turbo

abusive
Post #31

VR V6's have 130kw, the 147kw that you are talking about is in the VS and VT 3.8 litre ecotecs.

However, VPs have 130kw and due to thier weight are quicker than VR, VS and VT smile.gif

QUOTE (abusive @ Dec 5 2003, 06:31 PM)
VR V6's have 130kw, the 147kw that you are talking about is in the VS and VT 3.8 litre ecotecs.

However, VPs have 130kw and due to thier weight are quicker than VR, VS and VT smile.gif

Yes, I was lucky, I beat a stock V6 VT commodore a few months back , while cruising... huh.gif was abit shock as id throught the VT would be quicker than my V6 VN .... Good to know in away that my car isnt that bad (slow) than...lol. wink.gif

QUOTE (_J_e_n_ @ Dec 5 2003, 08:13 PM)
hahhaha all that crap for a question that got answered on the first page, classic  laugh.gif

well i'm glad you found out your answer audi_a4_turbo

Hehehe. The fact that its 130kw has been covered several times now tongue.gif

mAJORD
Post #34

yea, the most noticeable thing by most ppl when the VT came out was how much slower it felt after the vs, specialy the wagon, we had one at work and it felt like a slug

QUOTE (_J_e_n_ @ Dec 5 2003, 06:13 PM)
hahhaha all that crap for a question that got answered on the first page, classic laugh.gif

well i'm glad you found out your answer audi_a4_turbo

laugh.gif what alot of work to get the answer....seems like u (audi_a4_turbo)started a good debate on whats the engines are in a Holden...Soon someone will do a ford one and see what the output of them are... dry.gif

  • Member Login

    If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.

    Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.

    If you don't have an account create one below.

    Create Account
  • Login with Facebook

    Login using your Facebook account!

Page 1 of 2
Jump to page
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Loading...
x