#1
Post ![]() |
|
---|---|
HI all, Looking at buying a newer car soon and im curious to find out about the engines. Just wanted to know some pro's and con's on the Holden 4spd Alloytec 175 vs the 4spd Ford Barra 182. I know they are two different engines and just wanting to find out what problems/opinions people have... Any info would be great. ![]() This post has been edited by young_Gun: Feb 15 2009, 03:08 AM -------------------- *List past and present rides here...people really wanna know*
|
![]() |
blackers10
Post #3
the ford is a much much much more reliable engine (they are taxi's for a reason) |
---|
![]() |
Beanos351
Post #7
If i remember it correct, the Holden's V6 is more fuel efficient, but throw a set of extractors on the Ford's inline 6 and under regular driving it would be equalled out, plus the added power... blackers10 is correct too, they use Fords as taxis cause the motors generally last longer before catastropic failure! The list goes on, but we dont wann starta debate Ford vs Holden WW3 |
---|
![]() |
AVENGE
Post #9
Im a holden man, and personally if I was going to go a 6 from ford or holden I'd go the Ford I6. Although keep in mind just because its a good engine doesn't necessarily mean the rest of the car will be good. |
---|
![]() |
clutch-monkey
Post #13
QUOTE(young_Gun @ Feb 15 2009, 09:50 PM) [snapback]1283584281[/snapback] 4 speed auto. Will be either a XR6 Ute or a VZ Ute... oh right gotcha. i've only driven the manuals, sorry. |
---|
![]() |
aussiepride#1
Post #20
QUOTE(DAL32 @ Feb 16 2009, 12:34 AM) [snapback]1283585112[/snapback] Alfa Romeo use the new Commo block for the V6 Therefore it > the Ford engine Just to throw something in there that's pretty random, typical from me, and not really on topic of showing any knowledge about the engines in question whatsoever. ![]() |
---|
![]() |
typhoon_freak
Post #22
yeh. im with 84rge, the holdens make more power down low, but he fords produce it up top. i personally wud got for the ford for a 6 cyl but wud go holden for an 8cyl. try not get a 4spd auto.. too many probs. 6spd FTW thats if u can afford a 06/07 build date or later. |
---|
![]() |
BADEZ
Post #26
QUOTE(84RGE @ Feb 15 2009, 11:54 PM) [snapback]1283585008[/snapback] hey mate, the 16 will have more power up top, the holden has its power down low, the ford is better for economy too, but it depends on how you drive it. Im definately a ford boy but ive always been a sucker for an I6 QUOTE(typhoon_freak @ Feb 16 2009, 05:54 AM) [snapback]1283585327[/snapback] yeh. im with 84rge, the holdens make more power down low, but he fords produce it up top. i personally wud got for the ford for a 6 cyl but wud go holden for an 8cyl. try not get a 4spd auto.. too many probs. 6spd FTW thats if u can afford a 06/07 build date or later. hate to tell u but ur both wrong the new aloytechs are high reving motors and are shit down low, the ford motor has more down low but its not the power its the torque, havent been in a 175 alloytech but i have a 190kw alloytech and its not that great off the line but u cant escape a peak power is made at 6500rpm. i would choose the falcon if u are looking to modify as there isnt alot of parts avaliable for the new alloytechs atm especially when they are skipping making stuff for the vz and going to the VE but ether or are both nice cars. |
---|
![]() |
luxo-barge
Post #31
^eunique wrong. |
---|
![]() |
84RGE
Post #32
QUOTE(BADEZ @ Feb 16 2009, 09:47 AM) [snapback]1283585826[/snapback] hate to tell u but ur both wrong the new aloytechs are high reving motors and are shit down low, the ford motor has more down low but its not the power its the torque, havent been in a 175 alloytech but i have a 190kw alloytech and its not that great off the line but u cant escape a peak power is made at 6500rpm. i would choose the falcon if u are looking to modify as there isnt alot of parts avaliable for the new alloytechs atm especially when they are skipping making stuff for the vz and going to the VE but ether or are both nice cars. Good point, i agree the new alloytech are more economic, buck lack power even more so to make up for it, and the difference is a bees dickk. But if we are tlaking new motors then its the Barra 192 he wants, not the 182. Next year the Barra will be a compltely new design as well. There isnt too much avalable to modify the falcon either But simple in the way that all you need is a BF XR6T exhaust, Thypoon lower air intake, XR6T Upper intake, K&N Filter and your good for 200rwhp all up about $400 worth of mods, match that with a 6 speed (as everyone else suggests the 4spd is SHIT) your looking at a great package, and the selective shift is awesome and funn for an "auto" car. Then you can also look at getting 20% underdrives, LSD and Throttle Body spacer and your looking around 210rwhp |
---|
![]() |
luxo-barge
Post #33
QUOTE(AVENGE @ Feb 16 2009, 10:09 AM) [snapback]1283585921[/snapback] Ahh no they're not, they're exact same engine just tuned differently A bit more than a tune. They redesigned the timing chains and intake plenum to help with the harshness and horrible noise at high revs. The VE version is a much better engine....however the I6 is still smoother and has both more torque and power. |
---|
![]() |
BADEZ
Post #34
yes the VZ saw the release of the 175 and 190 alloytech |
---|
If you have a BoostCruising account enter your user name and password into the yellow box.
Alternatively, you can quickly login with Facebook.
If you don't have an account create one below.
Create AccountLogin using your Facebook account!