Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: 2003 Chrysler Crossfire
Boostcruising.com > Site Sections and Galleries > Performance Cars
Mcleod

Specifications

Manufacturer Chrysler   Engine 3.2 Litre 90° V6
Model Crossfire   Valvetrain SOHC 3 Valves / Cylinder
Drivetrain Front Engine / RWD   Power 160 kW @ 5,700 rpm / 310 nM @ 3,000 rpm
Transmission 6 Speed Manual w/ Overdrive   Redline 6,000 rpm
Wheels 18" Alloys Front, 19" Alloys Rear   0-100 Km/h N/A
Brakes Ventilated Front Discs and Solid Rear Brake Discs w/ Single-Piston Sliding Calipers at the Front, Opposed-Piston Calipers at the Rear, Power Assist & ABS   Top Speed N/A
Weight 1388 kg   1/4 Mile N/A

dhdevil
they allso do a supercharged 3.2 v6 good for 240kw.

nice car, pushing the shape/lines a bit but i like it!!
roweysvn
My old boss got himself one of these, a very nice machine indeed
HAB008
These cars are off the hook... very nice
70XIN
ugly as imo sad.gif but sound pretty decent biggrin.gif
Ahmad
not a fan of the back but yea everything else is looking good
magna6
as the guy from top gear said, its looks like a dog taking a sh*t. I find it hard calling that a performance car either
GHOSTrun
"Power 160 kW @ 5,700 rpm / 310 nM @ 3,000 rpm "

...are you serious? what a waste of money.....<pause>......160 KILOWATTS THAT'S IT?!?!?!!?!?!??!?!

pffft my stock turbo sil80 could give that a run for it's money and it prolly only cost like 5% of what that did lol tongue.gif

I like the interior, styling in expensive cars is always nice (also why they are expensive wink.gif), as for the shape the front looks alright but the back just looks weird dry.gif
nought2sixty
Thats a goddamned awful car...19" wheels on such a low powered car...it can't steer...it's top speed is terrible for a 3.2 and well...look at it! I know two people that have these and they brag about them so much, but I've seen it outstripped by a '93 MR2...and that little tea tray that comes up over 60mph dunno.gif
magna6
Stats suggest that car wouldnt be much faster at all than my magna. High 14's i'd suggest. I thought slower than that originally and then i saw that it only weighs 1388kg, i had expected it would of been heavier than that dunno.gif

70NKY
Why 19's on the rear and 18's on the front? Why different rim sizes?
ItalianStallion
high performance????? dude its GM
LOOK AT THE PLASTIC!! angry.gif
FAL53
Feed that baby a cheese burger so she gets an ass !! nice front though
clutch-monkey
its 0-100km/h time is 7.3 seconds. an integra can do that.... so can most commodores
GHOSTY
Mostly see yuppies driving these around town
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.