2003 Chrysler Crossfire |
|
|
|
2003 Chrysler Crossfire |
Aug 1 2005, 01:12 PM
Post
#1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Where it all began... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Site Management Posts: 5,922 Off Topic Posts: 800 Joined: 4-October 02 From: Brisbane, Qld, AU Member No.: 1 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
-------------------- :: http://www.boostcruising.com :: http://www.sanitytech.net/ ::
Remember the rules here: - no shit fights, no shit stirring, no abuse. - no dissing other people's cars. - no 'adult content' in avatars. We aim to keep this site at a high quality, so parental guidance is recommended for the immature that can't follow the basic rules! |
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2005, 03:52 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Standard User ![]() ![]() Group: Users Posts: 317 Off Topic Posts: 6 Joined: 27-February 05 From: Australia Member No.: 20,247 |
they allso do a supercharged 3.2 v6 good for 240kw. nice car, pushing the shape/lines a bit but i like it!! |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2005, 04:47 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Give me a kiss sweetheart. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Moderators Posts: 7,798 Off Topic Posts: 18,216 Joined: 18-March 03 From: Gold Coast Member No.: 1,938 |
My old boss got himself one of these, a very nice machine indeed
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2005, 05:40 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() ..::*b00bies*::.. ![]() ![]() Group: Users Posts: 417 Off Topic Posts: 1,641 Joined: 25-July 05 From: Coolangatta Member No.: 28,824 |
These cars are off the hook... very nice
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2005, 10:44 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() TOXIN TOXIN ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Users Posts: 10,784 Off Topic Posts: 7,592 Joined: 24-May 04 From: Brisbane :) Member No.: 9,849 |
ugly as imo |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2005, 10:54 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() ... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,150 Off Topic Posts: 6,298 Joined: 24-August 04 From: Brisbane Member No.: 11,810 |
not a fan of the back but yea everything else is looking good
|
|
|
|
Aug 2 2005, 01:04 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() 6G72 power! ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Users Posts: 1,132 Off Topic Posts: 1,238 Joined: 9-June 03 From: Brisbane Westside Member No.: 2,902 |
as the guy from top gear said, its looks like a dog taking a sh*t. I find it hard calling that a performance car either
|
|
|
|
Aug 2 2005, 02:52 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Regular User ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 2,152 Off Topic Posts: 112 Joined: 13-June 05 Member No.: 26,285 |
"Power 160 kW @ 5,700 rpm / 310 nM @ 3,000 rpm " ...are you serious? what a waste of money.....<pause>......160 KILOWATTS THAT'S IT?!?!?!!?!?!??!?! pffft my stock turbo sil80 could give that a run for it's money and it prolly only cost like 5% of what that did lol I like the interior, styling in expensive cars is always nice (also why they are expensive |
|
|
|
Aug 2 2005, 03:48 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Standard User ![]() ![]() Group: Users Posts: 55 Off Topic Posts: 0 Joined: 28-July 05 From: United Kingdom Member No.: 28,969 |
Thats a goddamned awful car...19" wheels on such a low powered car...it can't steer...it's top speed is terrible for a 3.2 and well...look at it! I know two people that have these and they brag about them so much, but I've seen it outstripped by a '93 MR2...and that little tea tray that comes up over 60mph This post has been edited by nought2sixty: Aug 2 2005, 03:50 PM |
|
|
|
Aug 3 2005, 01:55 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() 6G72 power! ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Users Posts: 1,132 Off Topic Posts: 1,238 Joined: 9-June 03 From: Brisbane Westside Member No.: 2,902 |
Stats suggest that car wouldnt be much faster at all than my magna. High 14's i'd suggest. I thought slower than that originally and then i saw that it only weighs 1388kg, i had expected it would of been heavier than that This post has been edited by magna6: Aug 3 2005, 02:00 AM |
|
|
|
Aug 6 2005, 03:20 AM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() 1988 Mazda FC RX-7 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Technical Members Posts: 2,026 Off Topic Posts: 92 Joined: 3-February 03 From: Bracken Ridge Member No.: 1,437 |
Why 19's on the rear and 18's on the front? Why different rim sizes?
|
|
|
|
Aug 12 2005, 08:29 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Site Newbie Group: Users Posts: 10 Off Topic Posts: 0 Joined: 11-August 05 From: Australia Member No.: 29,821 |
high performance????? dude its GM LOOK AT THE PLASTIC!! This post has been edited by ItalianStallion: Aug 12 2005, 08:30 PM |
|
|
|
Aug 27 2005, 12:08 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
radical ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Users Posts: 633 Off Topic Posts: 6 Joined: 14-August 05 From: Australia Member No.: 29,947 |
Feed that baby a cheese burger so she gets an ass !! nice front though
|
|
|
|
Aug 28 2005, 05:28 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Senior User ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Users Posts: 6,141 Off Topic Posts: 3,555 Joined: 16-August 05 From: mexico....well, capalaba Member No.: 30,049 |
its 0-100km/h time is 7.3 seconds. an integra can do that.... so can most commodores
|
|
|
|
Jun 1 2009, 08:09 PM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() skating on black ice ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Users Posts: 1,105 Off Topic Posts: 31 Joined: 8-December 08 From: Brisbane/Gold Coast Member No.: 151,236 |
Mostly see yuppies driving these around town
|
|
|
|
|
|
|